Sheepole comment smack down. I received a comment about a recent post (from a Christian blogger Paul Tamez) about how we Liberals need to frame the whole debate over the Rove treason affair, and how it should always go back to the 16-word lie in Bush’s State of the Union address, and all the other lies that led us into this illegal war. Her is my response to him.

You guys take the cake. It's the same old wah wah wah, whining and complaining from the left all the time.

No I wasn’t complaining I was just pointing out that outing a CIA agent in the time of war is serious - TREASON. When President Clinton received a consensual blow-job (which by the way was none of our business), you Conservatives were in a tizzy, we had a Constitutional crisis on our hands. Where is the outrage now, um let me see, a lie about a consensual blow-job versus the treasonous outing of a CIA agent in a time of war? Even your President says he wants to get to the bottom of this, why don’t you, why are you so quick to label it whining?

I was ready to go to war the afternoon of September 11, 2001, when terrorists attacked our soil.

Hey so was I, in Afghanistan, where the perpetrators who attacked us were, hey, remember that bin Laden guy, where is he, uh, Paul, what about him? Remember your President talking tough, “Wanted Dead or Alive,” and all, why doesn’t he talk about him any more. But No, your President was in such a big hurry to move on to Iraq, which had little if any connections to bin Laden, al Qaeda, no WMD’s, didn’t attack us, and was no imminent threat, that your Bush boy didn’t finish the job in Afghanistan. Now Afghanistan is festering again because Bush took is eye off the ball.

And it was against an enemy who hides in caves and won't identify themselves with a uniform. The war is against not only them but any nation who harbors them.

Hey Paul where were the recent London bombers living - in a cave? By your logic, since they were living in London (Britain must be harboring them) we should attack Britain while we are at it!? Oh, and by your logic how many countries are harboring terrorists, ten, twenty, fifty, so we should attack them all. I would venture to guess that there are plenty of terrorists right here in America, maybe by your logic we should attack ourselves? I hate to break it to you but there isn’t a finite number of terrorists that we can kill, and once we kill all of them it is over. The problem is that the more we kill the more we create. Go here for one level headed Muslims take. Also, check The American Conservative. This editorial cartoon below says it all!

Stop your whining and remember your countrymen and women that were lost to an act of war.

OH, Just like your conservative buddies who continue to say one thing while cutting veteran benefits at the same time and sending them into this war without the proper equipment to begin with! Paul, do a little bit of research, here is a good place to start. Also, go here.

Weapons of Mass destruction? His name was Sadaam Hussein. We got him. Now it's time to strategically set up a base in Iraq. What an opportunity.

Ye, what a great opportunity to create more and more terrorists, there were NO suicide bombings in Iraq prior to our occupation, now they are a daily occurrence. How do you think that makes the average Iraqi citizen feel, my guess is that it makes them a little bit pissed off and not quite ready to embrace Bush’s brand of democracy. Sadaam Hussein a WMD, OH, that is priceless, yes he was a WMD towards his own people, but not towards us. Let me guess you are Pro-life, all for the sanctity of life, but the killing of innocent citizens in an illegal war don’t fit into your “sanctity of life” view. What a hypocrite! Paul I'm certain you are a good person, good family man, Christian and all, but unfortunately you are a Sheepole who is blinded by unquestioning patriotism. We should all be patriotic to a point but we should never stop asking questions of our goverment. Blind Faith in Bad Leadership is not Patriotism!